2 Assumptions, theoretical framing, philosophical underpinnings

From Stellar Deliverable 1.1

This wiki builds on the Prolearn Roadmap and the final Kaleidoscope report. We consider it to be important to understand - and make explicit - the underpinnings of these reports. We suggest that STELLAR need not neceessarily subscribe to the same underpinnings but we also believe that it is important to be clear about what our foundation is, in terms of 1. our assumptions (about technology that mediates learning in some way, about learning mediated by technology, about research, collaboration in research and learning etc.) 2. our theoretical framing 3. our philosophical perspectives.

We begin by discussing the implicit assumptions in the title and description of work (DoW) of our project, STELLAR. Sustaining Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL) Large-scale multidisciplinary Research.

Understanding the term TEL (see also "Discussion")

TEL is a widely used term, but what does it actually mean? Does it mean the same thing as e-learning? Does it mean the same thing to everyone? Does it mean the same thing in the different silos that comprise our fragmented community?

What is technology? In this context, we suggest it actually means ‘digital technology’ – but perhaps not all digital technology – mainly computer hardware and software. Is this the same as ICT?

What is learning? We think it is highly problematic to talk about learning, and suggest that in this context, what is actually meant is ‘opportunities for learning’. Opportunities for learning can be planned, perhaps to address some particular content (curriculum), and this can be seen as ‘formal learning’. However, we argue that all life experience offers opportunities for learning, and suggest that unplanned opportunities are usually referred to as ‘informal’. Further, we suggest that STELLAR needs to consider learning throughout life, taking into consideration, for example, young children learning in the home, school, college and university learning, learning at work, learning as a by-product of work etc. (learning through play as well)

What is technology enhanced learning? Does this term imply that technology does enhance learning? Does it always? When it is used, are the learning opportunities better in some way than when it is not used? Or are the opportunities different – in which case should we be talking about technology enabled learning? We suggest that what we are really talking about it technology mediated learning, and that it is important to be critical about the extent to which the mediation by the technology actually does enhance opportunities for learning.

STELLAR uses the term TEL but we hold in our consciousness the complexity of this term and take into account different nuances it holds for different groups within our network.

1. Our assumptions Collaboration is a good thing. Good communication tools are needed for collaboration. Technology is here to stay.

2. Our theoretical framing Person plus? Technology can't replace the teacher who remains crucially important (in formal learning situations).

3. Our philosophical perspectives Learning as situated.

Other things to think about Ethical considerations - privacy - security - digital divide